The last year or so, my search engines have been clogged with blots (I decline to dignify them as blogs) about what is right/wrong with Linux. Most of the instances I have actually traced seem to be from folks with only a few (very few) months of Linux time. As someone who started using Linux in the previous century – and blossomed with it on retirement (freedom from Yankee government paranoia,) I have a few comments to offer. These comments are based purely on my own experience I don’t pretend to speak for others who use Linux.
I should mention that as a Civil Service employee I had to use Microsoft WINDERS, Apple OS, as well as Linux and its relatives. The first desktop I used was an HP-9830 which was great for simulations and number smashing but as word mangling friendly as a CDC mainframe.
What is the HARDEST thing about Linux? ANS: the First Install. Simply put what is hard about Linux is
- download the distribution: this is in a range of difficulty of impossible to circumcision sans anesthesia because the Yankee government considers downloads to be acts of espionage;
- burn the distribution on a USB stick: this is actually even harder because it takes a signature from a senior civil servant (GM-14 or higher) to be issues a USB stick;
- Install the distro on an old PC: this is semi-criminal. There is no rule – that I know of – to install a non-authorized OS on a old junker PC but it’s the sort of thing that brings the security wonks out in force with their long knives and blood lust.
- Of course, these are also hard for folks in private industry or working at home on their own system. The rest of Linux is easy.