Second Day Seconds

The situation is deteriorating. Temperature situation that is. Which is not enjoying or whatever the word is for improving my outlook. Also the day of horror is approaching and the anticipation is grinding me down. Is there a country anywhere that has no holidays? Nor bogs, nor religionists, nor worthless political office holders? I doubt it. Just because the majority of humanity are bogs. So much for the wisdom of calling ourselves "sapiens".

I have come to the conjecture that the primary punishment for intelligence is that we consistently misuse it. We know that humans have an evil side and are greedy and mean and nasty and instead of trying to find effective ways of dealing with that we invented religion and government and law. All metastable failures. And that evidently is the best that we can do because we don’t seem able to even try to do better. Perhaps going quietly into the night would be the best thing?

Perhaps Black Friday is the better side of Thanksgiving? And the commercial aspect of Christmas?

And I’m not about to get into l’affaire Ferguson.

Real Strength

Yesterday was quite harrowing. My first physical after aging into Yankee government oversight and much leaping through burning hoops and other pains. To be continued next week. Funeral not to follow, regardless. And the constitutional this morning was fair, a bit depressed even because I had to return to my usual “The Pen Addict” porcast as the diversion. My previous experimental samplings of “Probably Science” and “Professor Blastoff” were highly undiverting, unentertaining, and unscience, the former spending rather too much time on exterior defecation and Hitler’s dementia and the latter on primary sexual organ cancer self-screening. Not that the latter isn’t of importance but it isn’t my idea of a science podcast. I should mention that both of these were recommended by POPULAR SCIENCE magazine and were the only ones on their list I was unfamiliar with. Overall grade for PS: C-; mostly because they missed the best science podcasts for some strange reason that I have been unable to get an answer to. I should also mention that my subscription was quite discounted and when it expires will probably not be renewed. I have to put PS in with SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN for satisfying Sturgeon’s rule with an exponent between one and two.

I was rather relieved however, to note an article [Link] about research done by the Max Planck Institut for Darwinian Biology. The study claims that humans traded off muscle strength for mental strength (intelligence) as they evolved. The study is based on muscular comparisons with other primates.

Yes, reverend, animal comparisons. Since we humans are ANIMALS! Including cheerleaders. And debutantes.

I find this rather entertaining and amusing. It seems to explain a lot. First of all, the true measure of humanness is smarts not strongs. Our perverse engagement with spectator sports and macho and all such is nothing more than insecurity and primate envy. From this it is clear that nerds, and geeks, are the actual humans and the bogs are degenerate lees of the gene pool. And algebra rejection is a form of denial.

But I still have to think to figure out politicians since they seem to have neither type of strength. Perhaps our attitude in Alibam is accurate that electing politicians keeps them off the welfare rolls?

, , ,

Academic Smarts

Once more into week in. And off to a good start. The podcast, an episode of the CBC’s “Best of Ideas” on modern idolatry, one of my favorite rants, was passable, and I managed to endure the obnoxious density of weight bouncers. So it seems meet that I clean up a few aging articles this morning.

First, the wonks at fair Hahvahd claim that they have observed monkeys doing maths. [Link] No mention if the monkeys are students or staff. And the purpose of all this is somehow related to something called Weber’s Law which has to do with magnitude and difference of two stimuli. Evidently these wonks have never heard of Rayleigh’s criterion.

Another study, [Link] this one out of Purdue, looks at the relationship between trailer parks and tornadoes. Seems that tornados are most likely to touch down in the boundary regions between urban and rural areas, which is where trailer parks tend to be built. Perhaps this is a good indication that we need to start building traler parks in the middle of cities and housing developments? It would at least improve the quality of news reportage, depriving it of all those toothless, obese people who live in trailers. Except after flood and hurricanes, of course.

Next, a pair of articles. The first, from U Colorado, [Link] presents some pretty compelling argument that Neandertals were smarter than Sapiens. The second, from U Michigan, [Link] speculates that Neandertals had develop boil-in-bag cooking. This latter is rather more exciting than it seems since boiling is commonly pegged to the period after sedentaryness when basketry and pottery were developed. Taken together the two make an impressive argument for the mental superiority of Neandertals. So why did they die out? The obvious conjecture is that they were so disgusted with having us as neighbors they just gave up and died.

That’s a good start for Monday.

, , , ,

Scientist Intelligence

Not a bad morning so far. A bit nippish but nowhere as heat deprived as the middle and aft end of the week, Or at least that’s what the weather beavers foretell and I suspect they are being optimist and misleading. The gym was pleasantly sparse although the podcast was a bit dull.

So I was in a very good situation to consider an article [Link] sent me by a colleague, Magnetic Inductance Force, about how natural scientists are more intelligent than social scientists. I am not sure of this, personally. It seems to me rather like comparing one type of fruit with another. Are biologists less intelligent than physicists because they can’t do maths as well? Are biologists more intelligent than economists because what maths they can do they get right? I am not sure.

From what I have seen, intelligence quantification is somewhat arbitrary and subjective. Not to mention that intelligence itself is poorly posed and worse defined.  It seems rather like measuring the mass of a proton with a postal balance.

Having worked with other STEMs, and I think I can, on an individual basis, extend the appellation to include social scientists, I know that their smarts – I shan’t call it intelligence – is different from that of natural scientists. In facts, mathematicians are different from physicists from chemists…….. So there.

But I am still not convinced that bogs are actually intelligent. Or even sentient.

Chaotic Stupidity

Mundane day is back. And joyously! No noise pollution courtesy of the city parents, and the gym was delightfully sparse. The podcast was another episode of the CBC’s “Best of Ideas” series on secularity and it was quite good, finally getting around to the advancements in society being directly the result of increasing secularity and the inherent controlling nature of organized religion. And the evil (?) of fundamentalism. There was even a bit of humor about the latter which is rather refreshing for one who lives in the religionist pig pen of the old Confederacy. They even talked about how the obsession with end times is a direct fallout of reconstruction.

On a more intriguing azimuth I ran across an article [Link] about the half-century anniversary of the beginnings of the study of chaotic behavior. Unlike James Glick and others I am not quite comfortable with calling it Chaos since the origin of the term is non-STEM. I also had to reflect that much of the original maths development, especially with the classic logistic differential equation, was simply bad maths. That was always a problem for me, on the one hand the finite difference maths types talking about error propagation and instabilities of too large a step size and the chaotic behavior folks talking about BOOM! behavior at step sizes far beyond the stable. Why, I wondered, couldn’t they get their stories straight?

Also intriguing is an article [Link] about an academic study that indicates human intelligence has decreased since the reign of Victoria. This is another brick in the wall that suggests that technology makes us stupid. Not that we didn’t know that, but it is nice to have it made sorta official.

Now we just have to wait for the politician to pass legislation that makes it illegal for us to not be stupid.

, , , ,

Gripe Sermon

OK, it’s the back side of week out, I am up at least an hour early because of the perversities of the Yankee congress and its necrophilic affair with daylight savings time, so I may as well share my absence of good feeling and will by getting about the matter of disposing of old tabs.

First, some of the wonks at fair Hahvahdd have put motors on truncated toothbrushes and turned them loose in a circular enclosure.[Link] They find

“These guys make their discovery using BristleBots, simple automatons made from a toothbrush head and a cellphone vibrator motor.  Put a few of these into a circular enclosure and they wander around at random. But when Giomi and co increased the number of BristleBots, they began to self-organise into things like swirling swarms. The transition from disorder to order is triggered only when the density reaches some threshold.”

This is, according to the reportage, a simpler and stranger explanation for the behavior of group animals like ants and termites. My immediate thought is what is the mean distance between collisions? As the number of brushbots increases, the number of collisions per time increases. Now if the bots begin streaming, moving in the same direction, then collisions between them transfer less energy and are less disruptive, so the stream tends to maintain itself. But that’s just the mental flatulence of an SCP. The wonks at Hahvahd will likely come up with other, better thoughts.

Next, we have a lovely article [Link] with the title “Bunnies implicated in the demise of Neanderthals”. One of my colleagues, Magnetic Inductance Force, directed me to this article via his FaceScroll page. I, like he, was bemused by the title. Were neandertals like children in being unable to eat cute animals?That seems charmingly implausible. We like to think of neandertals as cartoon Georges, half of whose practical uttered vocabulary is duhhhhhhhhhhhhh. The thesis of the boffins, at least according to the journalism, is that neandertals were unable to hunt small animals. The problem with the thesis, as seems to be so often the situation with anthropology and hence why it may not be a science as they seem to now be claiming, is that it is untestable, at least to my simple viewpoint. Lacking an an actual neandertal no test would seem possible.

It did occur that neandertal characteristics tend to display often in general and flag officers, so I considered asking my colleagues who are such to try rabbit hunting. But upon cogitation that seemed doomed to failure. First of all one could not gather enough cooperative general officers to do a herd hunt, and since all of these fellows have agile aides, they would likely send them off on solitary hunt. So once more the thesis seems untestable. The one colleague I asked of this admitted that he did enjoy rabbit but also confided one should hunt them with a shotgun firing steel buckshot so that the shot could be easily found and removed to preserve one’s teeth. This display of canniness did not bode well for the thesis.

Next,following along on my earlier tirade about college, is an article [Link] about the PhD glut. Easter Island vindicated! If you exceed the carrying capacity of the environment, starvation ensues and lots die. I ain’t gonna harp on this too long since it’s just the recognition of what I have said many times before. But I will reiterate that a PhD shouldn’t be a career move, it should be a calling.

And while on education, a lovely article [Link] entitled “Online courses need human element to educate”. This one also fits with my tirades. It’s simple, if the teacher and students don’t engage there is less information exchange and no motivation to understanding. That’s the problem with those megaclasses in bit halls. No engagement. And it’s worse on-line. But I fear money will out and good people like this author will get squashed like squirrel road kill on the street in from of Castellum SCP.

Speaking of road kill, I ran across, via Lifehacker, this article [Link] in the New Yawk Times about a new enumeration that “cataloged some 42,500 Nazi ghettos and camps throughout Europe, spanning German-controlled areas from France to Russia and Germany itself, during Hitler’s reign of brutality from 1933 to 1945.” If you, strangely, are a holocaust denialist, your position just got a bit more tenuous – vapid even – and nekulturny.I do want to emit the plug that this is about political ideology, not per se nationality.Most countries have done death camps. Here in Amerika we had Andersonville and some Yankee counterparts. So its not localized, it’s specific, as in species.

Finally, some work out of U Washington [Link] that while we Amerikans are living longer we are more miserable in our seniorness than other nation’s citizens. The blame is put on lifestyle errors. I have to say this one didn’t surprise me. Seniorness is often a matter of an absence of comfort. And I know that it’s all I can do to change my lifestyle to accommodate the instructions of medicalists – when they don’t conflict, which is TOO often because of absence of coordination and integration – much less adopt any gratuitous changes. But I do have to ask why we did (and are doing) such a poor job of communicating these health dishabits. No one tried to tell me these in  youth, and if they did they never said why. So the health boffins were rather like Catholics, preaching without testability but also not evangelizing.

Have a good sundae. Time to break fast.

, , , , , , ,

Hot Intelligence

Gad, I hate weekends. Especially sundaes when the christianist pseudo-shabat closes everything down and I am stuck in a vacuum of activity. It is at times like this that I empathize with the tin woodsman.

Speaking of which, I noted an intriguing article [Link] that argues that human intelligence is the result of coping with climate change. Not an implausible hypothesis but one that is less than obviously testable. Of course, we have spent much of the intervening 2-3 MY trying to negate that intelligence. Witness the climate change denialists today. Of course, there is a rather charming reverie of climate change denialists back then arguing that primates had no need for intelligence. Nice to know that the repulsians have been around so long.

For that matter, what positive contribution can the repulsians advance other than nominating Lincoln?

More particularly, this raises the question of how intelligence plays out in an overcrowded environment. That is, as climate change builds to the point where much of the environment, and thereby society and civilization, collapses, will intelligence do any good?

, , ,