STEM NERD Writing 1

A fair start to the day. Lower temperatures. Almost pleasant. And I listened to part of an episode of the “Pen Addict” [Link] podcast during my constitutional. One of my colleagues, Total Angular Momentum Magnetic Inductance, put me on this, which I share with another common colleague, Magentic Inductance Force, because we are all rather interested in pens and/or pencils and paper. The podcast started out as an attention diversion but after I commented a couple of times on the hosts’ grammar, it improved considerably and the podcast is – part of the time – enjoyable and informative.

I listen with some latency so the recent announcement of the podcast shifting (?) has caused some stress. And it has provoked me to reflect a bit on my own history with pens and writing and such.

So while this is not becoming a penphenalia blog, I am going to be doing some blots on the subject. Somewhere between reminiscence and history.

When I grew up, basically in the ’50’s and early ’60’s, I lived a pencil existence. We didn’t use pens much in schule. Even in high schule. But I do recall that I greatly disliked “wooden” pencils. They had to be sharpened. That meant you had to get up and walk over to the sharpener – a manual device in those days – and use it. I am not very mechanical. I have struggled all my life to learn to use tools, almost always unsuccessfully. In the Sowth this type of handicap is seen as gender incompetence. No male is tool incompetent.

Also, when you go to the pencil sharpener, people look at you. Not agood thing for an introvert in schule. Extro handle it naturally; intros get nightmares and contemplate suicide, or planetary destruction.

I recall getting my first mechanical pencil at about age seven. About the same time I got my first slide rule. It was a gift from my paternal grandfather. He was an insurance executive and got lots of pens and pencils given him and since this was an advertising pen I suspect it was a birthday gift of convenience. But successful and exciting and pleasing all the same.

It took the large – 2 mm? – leads of the day and had a clutch mechanism similar to those used in drafting pencils. The body was green plastic, a very warm feeling pen and not uncomfortable in my juvenile hand. I can’t recall what happened to it. Probably superseded or broken but the loss was emotionally decoupled so it could not have been traumatic. But that pen strated me on a road of NOT using wooden pens. The only time I used wooden pens after that was when I took those horrible standardized tests with the optical scoring forms for the selected answers. The ones where one had to use a “Number 2″ (what hardness is that?) “lead” (not graphite-clay mixture) pencil. The teachers were always pedantic about reminding of that I would have to go buy pencils specially for the exam. And abandon them as soon as the exam was over.

But I didn’t use a pocket protector. Never associated with anyone who used one until I went to work for the Yankee Army.

And there were pens along the way, but I don’t recall them. Pencils were the thing until I got to college. Film at Eleven.

, , , , ,

Fruit Fall

Gad, I already dislike summer. And it isn’t really here yet but its scouts are already annoying and irritating. That’s summer in Alibam: an itching of the nether regions. And that has nothing to do with the political environment.  Which is reminiscent of those medieval era setting vampire-werewolf oppressions. And yes, Alibam politicians are definitely parasites of the worst sort.

The constitutional was moderate mostly because I had the park to myself- except for critters – but the wind was almost non-existent. Still that is better than those bitterly hot winds that characterize so much of Alibam summer.

On the bright side, today is the birthday anniversary of William Whewell, who is the Victorian scientist who coined the term. I read on a book on him some time ago that made much of him and his colleagues but all I can recall was his coining of the term and some sort of difficulty with marriage. No, not repressed sexuality, but some organizational rule that was prohibitive. I also recall he was a big wind in the British national science organization which evidently was not as much of an indication of scientific incompetence as it is today. Anyway, there is a middling article on him at Wikipedia that I am too lazy to reproduce the URL.

Along which azimuth, I noted a cartoon [Link]

that I ran across yesterday and was rather bemused by. First of all, I have to wonder if the youthful, plague avoiding, Newton would have been wearing a wig to sit under a tree on a farm. Social conventions are seldom logical and rational from without.

It should also be mentioned that Newton did not “invent” gravity. There were already theories of gravity in place at that time. What Newton did was to come up with a consistent mechanics that included gravity in something more than a descriptive fashion. But it didn’t come to fruition under that tree. The falling apple planted the idea seed that grew into the tree of Newtonian mechanics.

How’s that for a really horrible metaphor?

And I have no idea what a “fruit hug” is. I am not even sure it is worthy of  mentation.

, ,

Piled Up

Week out is begun. Just finished my constitutional at the park. The air was unmoving so my heat dragged. Or more properly, I dragged it with me. No convective heat transfer. And the podcast was especially terrible, some acalculate mysticism about 1E2. But I downloaded episodes of two new – to me – podcasts yesterday and they may offer some relief. Although the ‘cast does serve its intended purpose of making all the others I listen to better by comparison. And better grammar. Mostly.

I noted in passing yesterday [Link] that the Moundville facility will begin observing its seventy-fifth anniversary today.

That’s the Douglas Jones Museum at the left in the picture. You can’t see the David DeJarnette Laboratory off to the right.

I have to admit to good feelings/memories about those two and the park itself. As an undergraduate I took and Anthropology track – two courses – of diversification study and one of those courses was New World Archaeology taught by Mr. DeJarnette. He was one of the greats to me, a capable teacher and an open mentor. He had high standards and openly shared his views. And being unable to convince me to abandon a frivolous existence majoring in the physical sciences and maths, put me to work on the physics aspects of various archaeological problems. Like dating some limestone caves in the Yucatan.

Doug Jones was a geologist and dean of the fartsy, nerdy schule at the campus of the Black Warrior. When two of my colleagues and I wanted to wander over to the mechanics schule and take FORTRAN, instead of the moneychangers schule’s COBOL, he was the fellow who “shouted havoc” for us. So both of these chaps molded my education and future.

I mention that because I ran across an article [Link] that indicates that students are much more likely to be successful in their endeavors if they have professors who mentor them. So while the mentoring was peripheral, I do attribute some components of my success – if I can call it that – to these two professors.

It is not easy to mentor an introvert. I was reminded this morning that one definition of an introvert is ” a person who would rather pay for something than get it free if social contact  can be avoided thereby.” Social contact in anthropology is hard to avoid. In a sense, it’s all about social stuff. And the average anthropological theory is overwhelming extro. So anthropology is no home for an intro.

I first went to Moundville as part of DeJarnette’s course. One of his duties was to be poohbah of the facility and he sent us off to see it. And I can say that it had a deep impression on me, one so deep I tried to impart it to my daughter – and failed.

It was wonderful then, with the museum, not yet named for Doug Jones, musty and dark, and the fascinating mounds. And it’s better today, not because of the museum being renewed but by the enrichment of the Yankee government returning the Duck Bowl

to its home.

But no, I am not going to the festivities. They’re for extro bogs. I’ll wait and go when there aren’t crowds and I can enjoy what is there.

, , , ,


Today is rather unusual. It is a dual holiday, at least here in Alibam. The state holiday is the birthday anniversary of Robert E. Lee; the Yankee government holiday is the birthday anniversary of Martin L. King. And somehow I find this not only not conflicting but also comforting.

I should offer at this point that this blot will not be very nice, offering, in the words of the Kingston Trio, something to offend almost everyone. So if you like to use either of the “R” words you may want to go on at this point and do something less harmful to your metabolism.

In my way of thinking, there are substantial similarities between Lee and King. Both were leaders in conflict, and the conflict was not without its righteousness. And both, so far as I can tell amidst all the serving rhetoric were men of integrity and principle. Also, both clearly were born and hence had a birthday. That latter is a poor attempt at humor.

I would also offer the opinion that both of these men aided the cause of liberty in Amerika. If anything, King was enabled by Lee, a consequence of history and the arrow of time, not any genetic superiority. Had Lee not refused Scott’s offer to command the Union armies, the war would likely not have lasted long enough for manumission to become a political necessity. Did Lee know this? Almost certainly not. But we can estimate it now.

So I shall take time today to reflect on how much both of these men contributed to the well being of Amerika.


, ,

Heady Stuff

Forget the Grinch, this year it is the Weather Beavers who are spoiling the holiday week. The last thing I want to do around Newtonmas is drip faucets. And the Target breech. How’s that for a snapshot of how we have corporate slavery?

My browser tells me 42 degF in Greater Metropolitan Arab and that may be about as good as the day gets. And this is supposed to be a good day in the week. At least the gym was sparse this morning. It was abundantly clear that schule was desessioned. No educationalists that I could find. The weight bouncers seemed to be bemused by this with their numbers reduced and all of their vocalizations limited to grunting, which was actually an intellectual improvement over the blather emitted by the educationalists. No wonder they lay claim to so many communities’ intellectual leadership – classic insecurity.

On a more joyous side, the Yankee congress has told the DoD that the country needs a “cyber militia”, which evidently is some sort of boondoggle for the air corps guard.[Link] I keep thinking of all those rich kids who hid in the air corps guard during Vietnam and all the poor kids who got sent to be infantrymen and airmen on site. There is probably a sort of sense of putting these cyber militia in the air corps since the army would have no idea how to recruit nor staff nor train. Which is the ideal place for rich kids avoiding some responsibility. But I have to give some thought to how the various state governors can use these militia during national disasters. Does the governor shopping at Target early in December qualify as grounds to deploy the state’s cyber militia?

I also see that academics at U Pennsylvania – somehow that makes sense – have suggested that the actual reason hunter-gatherers adopted stationary agriculture was to make beer.[Link] And here I thought it was because they got tired of wandering and never having nice things and wanted to be Burnsians and collect gear. Why is it to have great camping gear you can’t be year-round campers? The World Wonders.

Anyway, it seems a reasonable conjecture – maybe hypothesis? – that certainly upholds the food shortage idea. Or at least in this case, ethanol shortage. After all, only a few fruit actually ferment naturally and they tend to be ground droppers and hard to come by. So giving up nomadism to drink beer seems eminently good. I think the founding grandfather would approve since he claimed beer was proof the the deity’s love, probably the only “proof” of the deity’s existence that has ever been credible and not required pre-agreement.

, , , , , ,

Ball but no Chain

Here we are at the back edge of week in, looking into an abyss of holiday yuck and stress. For once the weather is waiting. My browser tells me it is 53 degF in Greater Metropolitan Arab and I was able to go to park and use the walking path instead of having to be placated by my stationary bicycle. But portents of nastiness are looming for the week out period.

That seems to sum up the situation I recently noticed [Link][Link] in articles having to do with some Neandertal DNA from the Denisova region. This DNA dates back about 50 KYA and is of such richness that it indicates some rather intriguing things. Based on the analysis, it seems that this DNA provides us a pre-date for incest taboo and marriage customs. This follows from both a close genetic correlation of the DNA individual’s parents (indicating some degree of incest) and a wide spectrum of outbreeding (which indicates some degree of sexual liberalism.)

In a sense, this is not surprising. Social structure was supposedly simple, the 25-50 people hunter-gatherer band although that labor structure is uncertain for Neandertals based on previous work that has indicated female might be hunters. Given a small social community with only sporadic outside contacts, interbreeding would be expected as a necessity to assure cohesion of the group and the production of offspring. Given the supposed egalitarian nature of such groups, fidelity may be a secondary consideration, which could indicate the genetic outbreeding was a natural extension during rare interband socialization, possibly as an alternative to fighting.

If so, this could also indicate a vector for the development of stronger socialization among bands and the evolution of marriage customs in response to the time bomb of incest. Regardless, this work would seem to not only give us a time datum for that period before incest was taboo and marriage had been adopted.

And it puts rather another counter to mystical religionist claims on the board.

, , , , , ,